Question:
I understand that Torah law prohibits physical contact between a man and a woman—or even for them to be alone in a room together—unless they are first-degree relatives or married to each other. This applies to any man and any woman, regardless of their ages or whether or not they are sexually attracted to each other, with only a few conditional exceptions. And then there are all those rules about “modest” dress. Isn’t that carrying it a bit far? Are we really such animals?
Answer:
When a man and woman are together in a room, and the door closes, that is a sexual event. Not because of what is going to happen, but what has already happened. It may not be something to make novels of, but it is a sexual occurrence, because male and female is what sexuality used to be all about.
It is true that in our world today, in the “free world” certainly, people have, on the whole, stopped thinking in these terms. What happened was that we started putting up all these defenses, getting steeled, inured, against the constant exposure and stimulation of men and women sharing all sorts of activities—coeducational school, camps, gyms—is that we started blocking out groups of people. We can’t be as naturally sexual as G‑d created us to be. When a man says, “I have a woman friend, but we’re just friends, nothing more, I’m not attracted to her in any sexual way, she’s not my type,” you’ve got to ask yourself what is really going on here. Is this a disciplined person? Or is this a person who has died a little bit?
What does he mean, “She’s not my type?” When did all this “typing” come into existence? It’s all artificial. It’s not true to human sexuality. And it really isn’t even true in this particular context, because given a slight change of circumstance, you could very easily be attracted. After all, you are a male, she’s a female. How many times does a relationship begin that is casual, neighborly, and then suddenly becomes intimate? The great awakening of this boy and girl who are running around, doing all sorts of things, sharing all sorts of activities, and lo and behold, they realize—what drama, what drama—that they are attracted to each other. These are grownups, intelligent human beings, and it caught them by surprise. It’s kind of silly.
So, closing a door should be recognized as a sexual event. And you need to ask yourself: Are you prepared for this? Is it permissible? Is it proper? If not, leave the door open. Should men and women shake hands? Should it be seen as an intimate gesture? Should any physical contact that is friendly be considered intimate? Hopefully, it should.
These laws are not guarantees against sin. They have never completely prevented it. There are people who dress very modestly. They cover everything. They sin. It’s a little more cumbersome, but they manage. All these laws are not just there to lessen the possibility of someone doing something wrong. They also preserve sexuality—because human sexuality is what G‑d wants. He gave us these laws to preserve it, to enhance it—and make sure it’s focused to the right places and circumstances—not to stifle it.
We have become callous about our sexuality. Even in marriage, a kiss on the run cheapens it, makes it callous—then we run to the therapist for advice. And do you know what the therapist who charges $200 an hour for his advice says? He tells the couple not to touch each other for two weeks. Judaism tells you that, free of charge. Yes, there are two weeks each month during which a husband and wife don’t touch. This therapy has been around for 3000 years. And it still works. It’s a wonderful idea.
When you don’t close the door on yourself and that other person, you are recognizing your own sexuality. You are acknowledging the sexuality of the other person. Being modest, recognizing our borders, knowing where intimacy begins and not waiting until it is so intimate that we’re too far gone, is a very healthy way of living. It doesn’t change your lifestyle dramatically, but enhances it dramatically, and you come away more capable of relaxing, better able to be spontaneous, because you know that you can trust yourself. You’ve defined your borders. Now you can be free. It takes a load off your mind, and it makes you a much more lovable person.
What about texting a guy, Is that not allowed and if so how do I explain it to him...?
I think it’s about both of your intentions. And both need to be on same page. A man is just a human, nothing wrong with a simple conversation.
If both are single and have interests in each others then why not. If ur happily then be open to him and also share it with ur husb.
It depends on so many factors.
Usually I see texting a man as an issue only if there’s hiding and lying involved.and mostly that happens in unhappy marriages.. where one is afraid to divorce. And they kinda wanna stay married and live a double life behind their husbands back. That’s when things get ugly.
Oh! Well I am a minor and not married at the moment, But thanks for the reply, I know this guy likes me but I see no future with him as in marriage wise still confused in a sense..
Why do u see no future if I may ask?
I’m asking because sometimes there’s small blockages why we belive so. I for example tried moving on from someone simply cuz of his age and he felt same it was too big gap. Until we both evolved and saw that it is possible and real love beats anything .
I spoke to him for a while, It turns out even though we have a 2 year age gap he is still lacking in maturity, And taking responsibility. If he wants somthing from me he will beg even if I ask him politely to stop, We don't share similar goals, values, and basic level understanding of eachother, I only want to talk to guys I intend to marry/date, Not just to have fun in the moment, Which he is the opposite he seems to want to be my friend but never leave or want more, which I don't do both. :/
Oh I see , ye u gotta enjoy the conversations and feel understood
So he is a player. Not serious. This kind of guys brings only drama, suffering for so many women, religious or not. Why open the door with texts and so on? Why giving him your time? Because you feel pressured by the “people pleasing” thing so many of us have?
If you felt it is not good for you that would be enough. So many women felt this at the beginning - the instinct - and then continued to see someone and ended up years later in disaster for them as so many men are just there to play. Nice words don’t mean a thing.
You have absolutely 0 reasons to entertain him. For your peace of mind and happiness. Women around the world started to say no and stay away from this type of men who are just time consumers. Women have this saviour complex and on their own emotional health dedicate to save some men. Just listen to your own instincts. Don’t open a door for suffering.
This is my humble opinion - a person who was a lifelong “shoulder to cry” for too many women. Shade him. Chose yourself.
Hi Ale! Thank you so very much for the response, update I did what you said around that time back in 2023! It was for the best and oh my goodness it's exactly how you say! Baruch Hashem I blocked him, he did reach out somehow and DID admit he was in it to "just talk to A girl" which obviously I lectured him on it until he left permanently, :] Anyways, Thank you so very much. I appreciate the comment, really! I hope anyone struggling with the same Chas Vishalom! Should find your comment, and from me to whoever reads this. It is exactly what Ale says! Have a good dayyy!!~☆ :D